"I'm grateful for the outpouring of support from the great majority of Americans who know in our hearts that Americans should treat others with respect, even when we disagree -- especially when we disagree about important moral issues like marriage."Respect? Respect is denying other people rights? Is this really the platform of Miss California. Why have they not stripped her of her crown? This isn't a "moral" issue you stupid, ignorant piece of chattel. It's a civil and legal issue. If you want it to be about "moral" things alone, then the government better cease to recognize any marriage at all. Oh, but it gets better.
"You probably know by now I believe very strongly that a marriage is between a man and a woman. This vision of marriage is not hateful, it's not discriminatory. It's good."Apparently, dim-bulb here needs a dictionary for Christmas. To help her define the term "discriminatory". It is discrimination when you allow civil and legal rights to married couples of the opposite sex, but not to those of the same sex. Like power of attorney. The right to visit their significant other if they're dying in the hospital. If you're not married, and your partner is dying, his or her family can refuse you entry to his or her hospital room because you are not related or married and have no legal right to see them. I can't even begin to imagine how absolutely devastating that is. And if you are to die, your partner cannot carry out your final wishes, because they have no legal right to do so. And this doesn't even get into issues of health insurance, tax exemptions, and other things that have to do with government and not religion.
"I do not want to raise my own children in a world where this traditional view of marriage is considered hateful or discriminatory."Dude, I really don't want your dumb, unthinking self having children. Please, use protection.
Case in point. She can't even interpret the question. She is a liar or just plain stupid as well. You haven't had any negative feedback? Are you living in a bubble, you ignorant, unthinking prick. Or are you just a liar?"VAN SUSTEREN: Are you taking heat for this? Because there certainly was a lot of controversy when you answered the question at the pageant, and then Perez Hilton blogged about it, and it sort of got everything all revved up.
PREJEAN: Am I taking any heat for this?
VAN SUSTEREN: Yes, any additional heat for hooking up with the National Organization for Marriage.
I mean, are people giving you a hard time, or supporting you? In the last few hours, what's it been like?
PREJEAN: I haven't had any negative feedback. I've had only positive feedback."
I bet she doesn't even know what a civil union is. Fucking idiot."VAN SUSTEREN: What is your thought on civil unions?
PREJEAN: My thought on civil unions? You know what, Greta? I don't have the answers to everything. I'm not running for political office. I don't have the answers to everything, you know, in the world out there."
PREJEAN: Well, I'm not a politician, so I can't give you an answer to that.Thank god, because we have enough stupid politicians as it is.
Come on, we're not fucking stupid. They paid you off. I wonder how much money they waived in her face to get her to risk losing her crown as Miss California, because surely she had to know the risks. Unless she's even more dumb than I thought.VAN SUSTEREN: How did you get involved with them? They watched the pageant and watched the controversy, and they called you?
PREJEAN: Oh, this is a huge issue right now.
And they actually got in contact with me, and just said we thank you for standing up for what you believe, and, you know, traditional marriage. We see that you, we could tell that you wanted to win Miss USA so bad that night, and you took a stand. And, you know, you aren't afraid to stand up for what you believe in. We respect you for that.
So that's kind of how they reached me.
Revoke her fucking crown California! I can't believe for a second they want someone like this representing them and their state. What a loser.
Are plastic tits ( oops, sorry---bosoms )part of God's 'natural' law?
ReplyDeleteI'm almost willing to bet that if someone dug deep enough into their "bible" you would find that medical enhancement is against "god's law."
ReplyDeleteThis bitch needs to have her crown taken away from her! Not because she had to have construction done to make it look like she actually had tits, but because of what she's doing. This casts a bad shadow on California.
Actually the Bible says you can't wear clothes if they're made of more than one material (Deu 22:11) so I'm pretty sure that breast implants are out. I'm pretty sure that the Biblical writers would have been against synthetic materials too, if they had foreseen them (what was that about divinely inspired?). They're made of synthetic material, and besides, are made of more than one kind of material LOL.
ReplyDeleteYeah, Deu 22:11 should cover those synthetic boobies.
ReplyDeleteCalifornia must be so embarrassed. First Proposition 8, now this. I'm so glad she didn't get Miss USA. I was stunned with her answer. The California pageant has issued a statement saying that they weren't happy with her taking a stand that shows she doesn't represent all Californians.
ReplyDeleteThe California pageant needs to revoke her crown, not for the statement she made at the pageant, which was her personal opinion and she is entitled to it, however ignorant it is, but because she has been paid by these anti-gay rights organizations to speak on their behalf.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, you get mad props for using one of my favorite words...chattel. It is soooo apropos. Miss CA is a freaking moron and I can't wait to see her running alongside Miss AK(-47)...
ReplyDeleteWhat gets me, besides this woman's stupidity, is that people don't really know why she lost, but that doesn't stop them from opening up their mouths about it anyway. The right fixed on this story claiming some sort of unfair politically correct bias on the part of the judges and heavens knows that's the only reason this bimbo could possibly have lost, so she was robbed. Let's say that's true, that the judges didn't like her answer and that's what cost her the crown--SO WHAT? It was their right to make the decision they did. It doesn't matter if all of the world's people agreed with her answer, it's what the judges think that matters. That's what a fucking pageant is, people. Personally, I can't stand beauty pageants; it's fake and shallow and the girls, with some exceptions, are never really more than ciphers of a some imagined beauty ideal. Ms. Prejean showed that outward beauty isn't enough, one needs to be beautiful on the inside too, and she has neither.
ReplyDelete